ASU’s Ask A Biologist website wins prestigious SPORE prize

		IMAGE: Charles Kazilek is a winner of the SPORE prize for online educational innovation. Click here for more information.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science has chosen Arizona State University's "Ask A Biologist," an online resource for children's science education, to receive the Science Prize for Online Resources in Education, or SPORE, award.

The prize, established to "encourage innovation and excellence in education, as well as the use of high-quality online resources by students, teachers, and the public," recognizes the website's creative content and its developer, Charles Kazilek, director of technology integration and outreach in ASU's School of Life Sciences in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.

What set Arizona's Ask A Biologist apart? Reading interventionist Joan Howell with the Phoenix Elementary School District, a teacher for 20 years, says that it is Kazilek. "Charles simply knows how to connect with children," she says. "He has combined science and art and created a wonderful vehicle for learning. It keeps you aware of the Web, it's something local, it shows that ASU is a leading institution and it's infectious. We are very thankful at our school and in our district. He has opened up a world of possibility."

Kazilek's virtual world is kaleidoscopic, encompassing coloring pages, image and zoom galleries, games, stories, science career pages, teacher's resources, experiments, and language translations into Spanish and French. Entrancing more than a million visitors a year from across the globe, favorite offerings from amongst the 2,500 pages of content are the Ugly Bug contest and the Ask A Biologist's podcast, which injects children's voices, as co-hosts, in the website's audioprogramming (http://askabiologist.asu.edu/explore/watch_listen).

"The Ugly Bug contest teaches kindergarteners to sixth graders how to look at things closely," says Howell. "The details of the bugs inspire all sorts of questions. It's a wonderful skill for children to develop. They don't even realize that they are learning."

The numbers are telling: more than 10,735 votes have been cast to determine 2010's ugliest bug since it debuted on Oct. 31. Locked in battle are top contenders, the assassin bug and yellow dragonfly (http://askabiologist.asu.edu/activities/ubc).

Inspiration for the unusual comes easily to Kazilek, a double-ASU alumnus with a bachelor's degree in fine arts and a master of natural sciences degree, an avid photographer and aficionado of microcomputers and microscopy. Kazilek embraces the world, its challenges and puzzles with the same questioning approach as his charges.


Kazilek credits the perplexed public with much of the website's content development. "The Q&A feature has been one of the greatest tools for developing content for Ask A Biologist," he says. "It is our barometer to measure what topics and concepts excite interest, are fresh and intriguing and might be important to add to the website."

Besides showing that science is fun and answering more than 25,000 biology questions from children, teachers and parents in the last decade, Kazilek has also actively pursued building connections with the public he serves. In one year alone, he met face-to-face with 1,600 educators and nearly 1,000 K-12 students in Arizona, Washington, D.C, Indiana, and Texas.

Kazilek has likewise worked to expand his online partnerships, which have broadened his ability to expand online access to science learning. The more than 150 contributors involved in Ask A Biologist, including scientists, artists and experts from ASU and other learning institutions in the United States, such as Harvard and MIT, have grown to embrace the talents of volunteers from Panama, Columbia, India, France, England and Canada. Kazilek has also worked to bring other virtual technologies into K-12 classrooms to expand real-time access of youth to scientists at ASU and the Smithsonian Institution.

Laura Martin, director of science interpretation with the Arizona Science Center, points out that she and her staff can "refer students, teachers and families to his exceptional resources knowing that they offer good science, good pedagogy and up-to-date modes of access."

Martin is also quick to acknowledge Kazilek's enthusiasm, energy, generosity and "the creativity that has been invaluable to many of our own science center projects."

ASU and Kazilek join 11 other awardees selected in 2010 from entries from the United States and abroad. Other institutions recognized by the AAAS include Baylor College of Medicine, Carnegie Mellon University, Harvard, MIT, Johns Hopkins University, Rutgers University and the universities of Utah, Washington and Johannesburg, South Africa. A complete list of winners and their essays can be found at http://www.sciencemag.org/site/special/spore.

AAAS, who publishes the journal Science, created the SPORE competition to recognize that "being an outstanding science educator is as valuable to society as being an exceptional research scientist."
ASU and the School of Life Sciences have offered fertile ground for Kazilek's development of Ask A Biologist, the launch of a podcast series and other innovative educational approaches. Robert Page, dean of the School of Life Sciences, says "We, as a public institution, have a responsibility to reach out and make what we do accessible and relevant. Ask a Biologist is premier example of how we can and should engage the public in understanding what we do as scientists and the world around us."

###

To learn more about Ask A Biologist, which is part of the National Science Digital Library, and which is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation: http://askabiologist.asu.edu.

Maybe this is the kinda thing we need more of?

V for Vendetta hacker broadcasts video at Washington State University

An anonymous hacker who calls himself "V" hijacked the projector systems in more than two dozen classrooms at Washington State University (WSU) last week. The hacker asked students to stand up to administrators and then invited them to meet on November Fifth, in one year, to take action on campus.

 In V for Vendetta, V broadcasts a video message calling the British public to take action on November 5. "Remember, Remember, the Fifth of November."  According to Wikipedia, November Fifth commemorates the anniversary of when Guy Fawkes's tried to blow up the Houses of Parliament and assassinate King James I.

According to WSU 1812 on Facebook, Google offered the hacker a job. Will the hacker's video have any lasting impact at the university or be remembered as only a prank? We'll find out what happens next November Fifth.

Axis of Depression

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: November 18, 2010

What do the government of China, the government of Germany and the  Republican Party have in common? They’re all trying to bully the Federal  Reserve into calling off its efforts to create jobs. And the motives of  all three are highly suspect.........

So what’s really motivating the G.O.P. attack on the Fed? Mr. Bernanke  and his colleagues were clearly caught by surprise, but the budget  expert Stan Collender predicted it all. Back in August, he warned Mr.  Bernanke that “with Republican policy makers seeing economic hardship as  the path to election glory,” they would be “opposed to any actions  taken by the Federal Reserve that would make the economy better.” In  short, their real fear is not that Fed actions will be harmful, it is  that they might succeed.

Hence the axis of depression. No doubt some of Mr. Bernanke’s critics  are motivated by sincere intellectual conviction, but the core reason  for the attack on the Fed is self-interest, pure and simple. China and  Germany want America to stay uncompetitive; Republicans want the economy  to stay weak as long as there’s a Democrat in the White House.

And if Mr. Bernanke gives in to their bullying, they may all get their wish.       

Axis of Depression

What do the government of China, the government of Germany and the Republican Party have in common? They’re all trying to bully the Federal Reserve into calling off its efforts to create jobs. And the motives of all three are highly suspect.........

So what’s really motivating the G.O.P. attack on the Fed? Mr. Bernanke and his colleagues were clearly caught by surprise, but the budget expert Stan Collender predicted it all. Back in August, he warned Mr. Bernanke that “with Republican policy makers seeing economic hardship as the path to election glory,” they would be “opposed to any actions taken by the Federal Reserve that would make the economy better.” In short, their real fear is not that Fed actions will be harmful, it is that they might succeed.

Hence the axis of depression. No doubt some of Mr. Bernanke’s critics are motivated by sincere intellectual conviction, but the core reason for the attack on the Fed is self-interest, pure and simple. China and Germany want America to stay uncompetitive; Republicans want the economy to stay weak as long as there’s a Democrat in the White House. 

And if Mr. Bernanke gives in to their bullying, they may all get their wish.

Thanks to one of my favorite students, Janae Mycah!

I hate to put her on blast, 'cause she might be embarresed, but I wanted to thanks my favorite 1st Period student, Janae Mycah, for her excellent comments and her extra effort in visiting the blog and actually reading what I write!

You go girl! You will be rewarded, both in your grade, and in heaven too!

JG

More on Carl Sagan's Birthday....and a Pale Blue Dot...

The Voyager 1 satellite was launched in 1977. Carl Sagan had pushed for Voyager to take a photograph of the Earth when it reached the edge of the solar system. In February of 1990, having completed its primary mission, the spacecraft was directed by NASA to turn around to photograph the planets of the Solar System. One image Voyager returned was of Earth, showing up as a "pale blue dot" in the grainy photograph at the bottom. This image shows the earth at almost four billion miles away.

In the book  (Pale Blue Dot), Sagan related his thoughts on a deeper meaning of the photograph:

    From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of particular interest. But for us, it's different. Look again at that dot. That's here, that's home, that's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.

    Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

    The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.

    It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

Stewart rally's point -- don't divide us

Ozzy Osbourne on genome testing, Neanderthal lineage

 

In July, rocker Ozzy Osbourne became one of few to submit his blood to have his full genome sequenced and analyzed. The results are in, and it turns out his genome reveals some Neanderthal lineage, according to Scientific American.

Osbourne and his wife, Sharon, are expected to discuss the testing and its results Friday at the TEDMED 2010 scientific conference in San Diego, California. In a Sunday Times of London column (registration required), the former Black Sabbath front man said he was reluctant to submitting to the test at first. He eventually gave in to his curiosity over how he had managed to survive years of hard living and substance abuse.

"Given the swimming pools of booze I've guzzled over the years—not to mention all of the cocaine, morphine, sleeping pills, cough syrup, LSD, Rohypnol... there's really no plausible medical reason why I should still be alive," he wrote.

"Maybe my DNA could say why."

Happy Creation Day!

From PZ Myers awesome blog Pharyngula

Daniel Phelps just reminded me that today is 23 October, the date that James Ussher, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland, determined to be the very first day of creation in 4004 BCE. That makes the world 6013 years old today, in his chronology (if you're adding it up at home, remember that there is no year 0).

A quote from P. Z. Myers, noted evolutionary biologist.....

"The New York Times has what I consider a skewed but also personally flattering summary of the Secular Humanist convention. Skewed, because it focuses rather more on the disagreements on tactics that were on display, but weren't really the focus of most of the discussions — it was actually an amicable meeting. Personally flattering, because it dwelt more on that firebrand Myers (my full remarks are on the record) than was actually deserved. It read as if I were flailing among the dissenters, smiting the impure atheists with the jawbone of an ass, when I was really one among many in diverse discussions.

I'm going to take it as favorable coverage, though, because the conclusion does accurately convey my views.

Mr. Myers and other "confrontationalists" surely do alienate some potential Christian allies. But they may also give comfort to people like Claire, who feel like an invisible minority. Mr. Myers is way out of the closet as an atheist — proudly, outrageously so. We're here, he's saying. And we don't believe. And we have science and reason on our side. Get used to it."

Welcome To Block II!

To our returning and new students, welcome to South Pointe. As we discussed in class, I will occasionally post a link, story summary, video, or image on this blog that goes beyond what we talk about in class. If you like, you can visit this page, review what I've posted, and comment on it for some extra credit. 

You can even scroll down and comment on as many posts as you like for even more extra credit. You do have to review the material, and say something that lets me know you thought about the topic. 

To get the extra credit, just click on the comment link below each post, let me know what you think, and leave your full name, so I know who gets the extra credit. If you prefer, you can also send me an email with your comment at this address jgiacobbe_southpointe@cox.net (that's jgiacobbe_southpointe@cox.net).

Good luck this Block, and I hope you check back here often for clever, insightful, and really amazing stuff!

Rock on, dudes and duddettes!

Mr. G

For Bobby, who I never would have known, without Dr. Edwards!

Pioneer of In Vitro Fertilization Wins Nobel Prize in Medicine

The British scientist who pioneered techniques of in vitro fertilization, which in the last generation has revolutionized treatment for infertile couples who wish to bear children, was awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine this morning.

The researcher, Robert G. Edwards, an 85-year-old professor emeritus at the University of Cambridge, will receive the prize, worth about $1.5-million this year, at a ceremony in December. Mr. Edwards's work, which began in the 1950s and was conducted at Britain's National Institute for Medical Research as well as at Cambridge and at the Bourn Hall Clinic, was crowned in 1978, with the birth of Louise Brown, dubbed the world's first "test-tube baby."

Some four million more have followed. Sweden's Karolinska Institute, in Stockholm, hailed Mr. Edwards, who worked with the now-deceased Patrick Steptoe, for not only making IVF possible through important discoveries but also making it safe and effective through refinements and training for IVF specialists at the clinic. In its citation, the institute said Mr. Edwards's "contributions represent a milestone in the development of modern medicine."

What if God Was One of Us? 
Or what if he/she/it wasn't anything at all?

Federal Appeals Court Again Rules in Favor of Embryonic-Stem-Cell Research

By Paul Basken, of the The Chronicle of Higher Education

The Obama administration on Tuesday won another round in its legal battle to permit federally financed embryonic-stem-cell research, as a federal appeals panel affirmed its earlier decision to lift a temporary injunction while litigation on the issue continues.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has now ruled twice against enforcing the injunction, which was issued on August 23 by a lower-court judge in a case brought by researchers who raise ethical objections to work involving human embryos.

The decision allows the National Institutes of Health to continue its work on financing more than $70-million worth of research using embryonic stem cells, and avoids what the NIH has described as a potential disaster for a promising approach to attacking a range of ailments, including cancers, diabetes, heart disease, and paralysis.

The appeals court "understood the serious harm that the preliminary injunction would cause," said Anthony J. Mazzaschi, senior director for scientific affairs at the Association of American Medical Colleges.

The injunction was issued by Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in a case brought by two private researchers, James L. Sherley and Theresa A. Deisher.

Dr. Sherley and Ms. Deisher work with stem cells derived directly from adult patients rather than from embryos. In their lawsuit, they argue that President Obama's easing of restrictions imposed by his predecessor, George W. Bush, on federal support for embryonic-stem-cell research has unfairly deprived them of federal money for their own studies by increasing the competition for NIH funds.

The Justice Department, arguing the case on behalf of the Obama administration, says the two plaintiffs have suffered no real harm because the NIH provides far more money for work with adult stem cells than it does for work with embryonic stem cells. Dr. Sherley has already received $425,500 in NIH grant money, while Ms. Deisher has never even applied, the department said in a filing.

Obscure Provision in Federal Law

That lawsuit is continuing, but Judge Lamberth issued his injunction after concluding that the Obama administration's policy appeared to violate a longstanding provision in federal law that bans the use of federal money for research that involves the creation or destruction of human embryos. Embryos are destroyed when embryonic stem cells are obtained from them.

In a separate court filing this week, Story C. Landis, director of the NIH's National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, said that 73 of the 75 embryonic-stem-cell lines approved so far by the NIH were from embryos donated before the NIH guidelines were put into effect, in July 2009, suggesting that any possible violation of the older provision, known as the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, had already largely occurred under the terms of the Bush administration's policy.

The appeals court temporarily lifted the injunction this month, but gave the parties more time to file briefs before issuing a more-permanent order. That order came on Tuesday, and will remain in place while the appellate panel carries out a more-detailed review of the arguments. That means the federal financing of embryonic-stem-cell research can continue while the case before Judge Lamberth proceeds.

A trial of the lawsuit could last several months. Each side, however, have asked Judge Lamberth to end the matter by issuing a summary judgment in its favor. Both sides contend that the judge already has enough undisputed facts to make a final ruling. Either way, the federal appeals court and possibly the Supreme Court could still be months away from delivering a final resolution to the argument.

The NIH director, Francis S. Collins, told reporters in August that the case threatens 22 grants worth $54-million that are awaiting annual renewal, and an additional $15-million to $20-million worth of new projects. His chief spokesman, John T. Burklow, said on Tuesday he couldn't comment on the latest court ruling because of "pending legal actions."

Sen. Tom Harkin, a Democrat of Iowa who led a Senate hearing on the matter on September 16, issued a written statement on Tuesday calling the appellate panel's ruling a sign that "the tide is turning in our favor." But Mr. Harkin made no comment in his statement about whether he would continue to press for legislative action that would end any ambiguity about Congress's intent with the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.

What did you do for Blasphemy Day?

Today is the official Blasphemy Day, and I hope you all had a good time. I'm afraid I didn't do anything in particular, because every day is Blasphemy Day for me, and I'm a walking talking affront to god.

CFI had a video contest and announced the winners today. Here's the top choice in their Protect Dissent campaign:

Bill would exempt wolves from federal protection

Environmental groups ready to challenge legislation that would classify wolves as predators- By BEN NEARY, Associated Press 

U.S. senators from Wyoming, Idaho and Utah are proposing legislation that would strip wolves in the northern Rockies of federal endangered species protection. 

The legislation unveiled Thursday is the latest in a series of recent bills that generally are aimed at short-circuiting legal opposition from environmental groups opposed to seeing an end to federal wolf protections. 

Much of the environmentalists' concern has centered on Wyoming, where the state has proposed classifying wolves as predators that could be shot on sight in most areas. 

Wyoming officials say they would welcome removing federal protections. But environmental groups promise stiff opposition to any congressional effort to sidestep the Endangered Species Act and offer wolves less protection.

Rally to Restore Sanity - 10.30.10

http://www.rallytorestoresanity.com/

Scientists Are Optimistic as Appeals Court Lifts Injunction Against Stem-Cell Research

The federal government can continue to finance embryonic-stem-cell research, temporarily, because a federal appeals court on Thursday lifted an injunction that had blocked such work. The move added to optimism about eventual victory for university scientists who use this research in a search for cures for a range of devastating diseases.

The original injunction was issued August 23 by Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia. The appeals court lifted it after the Justice Department argued that the ban would harm both scientists and taxpayers.

But the court also ordered the two sides in the case to submit written briefs by September 20 setting out their arguments for whether the injunction should be put back into effect for an expected trial lasting several months. During that trial, Judge Lamberth will hear a full set of arguments over the legality of the Obama administration's policy of expanded federal support for embryonic-stem-cell research.

The new appeals-court action was especially welcome to stem-cell scientists because Judge Lamberth's injunction had prevented the National Institutes of Health from distributing millions of dollars in research money at a time, near the end of the federal fiscal year on September 30, when the NIH often awards many of its grants, said Anthony J. Mazzaschi, senior director for scientific affairs at the Association of American Medical Colleges. "At least in theory by this, they can restart the grant-review process," Mr. Mazzaschi said of the NIH.

for the rest of the article, click here.

 

2 asteroids to whiz harmlessly past Earth

 (uh oh, this may be the mother ship, so if you don't see me tomorrow....)

NASA says two small asteroids discovered just days ago will zip harmlessly past Earth on Wednesday, a double flyby that should be visible through a telescope.

The asteroids were discovered Sunday by the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey in Arizona. The Minor Planet Center in Massachusetts, which tracks asteroids and comets, determined there was no chance of an Earth collision.

Asteroid 2010 RX30, thought to be 32 to 65 feet long, will pass within 154,000 miles of Earth shortly before 3 a.m. PDT Wednesday.

The second one, dubbed 2010 RF12, will fly by about 11 hours later at a distance of about 49,000 miles. NASA says the second one is 20 to 46 feet long.


Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/09/07/20100907asteroids-to-pass-earth.html#ixzz0yucqNfgZ

Some Stephen Hawking Quotes

"We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star..."
--Hawking putting human existence in perspective in Der Spiegel

"...But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special."
--Hawking make us feel a little better again, in the same interview

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing..."
--Hawking in an except from his new book The Grand Design, on why God might not exist.

"I believe that the long-term future of the human race must be in space."
--Hawking arguing that mankind must take to the stars to continue to survive as a species. (See some of mankind's greatest explorations and adventures.)

"I think computer viruses should count as life. Maybe it says something about human nature, that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. Talk about creating life in our own image."

--Hawking on life and man's true nature